WHY AHMED LAWAN MUST STOP  STEPHEN ODEY, FROM ATTENDING PLENARY

0

WHY AHMED LAWAN MUST STOP  STEPHEN ODEY, FROM ATTENDING PLENARY

It is obvious that from the Judgements of the Appeal Court and the Supreme Court, Stephen Odey is no longer the Senator Representing Cross River North, in the Senate.

It is a known fact that the Independent National Electoral Commission, has obeyed the Judgement of Courts and has issued a Certificate of Return to Rt. Hon. Jarigbe Agom Jarigbe (MHR), which automatically invalidates the Certificate of Return earlier issued to Stephen Odey, after the By- Election.

The fact that the Apex Court has ruled on who was the authentic Candidate of the People’s Democratic Party is incontrovertible. The candidate remains Rt. Hon. Jarigbe Agom Jarigbe as affirmed by the Supreme Court judgement, which struck out the Appeal filed by Stephen Odey, challenging the decision of the Appeal Court.

The Appeal was struck out due to a defective Notice of Appeal, on the 25th of February, 2021.

We are reminded that Stephen Odey sought to be joined as an interested Party to the Suit and was joined at the Appeal Court. He went ahead to Appeal the Judgement of the Appeal Court to the Supreme Court.

He sought some reliefs from the Supreme Court, including his affirmation as the authentic candidate of the People’s Democratic Party in the December 5th, 2020 Senate By-Election for Cross River North. The Appeal to the Supreme Court by Stephen Odey was Incompetent and was struck out. The Appeal failed and Stephen Odey now claims he was not part of the Suit. This is an attempt to Approbate and Reprobate. These guys have gone gaga.

The man that appealed to the Supreme Court was Stephen Odey and not Chief John Alaga. Chief John Alaga was one of the Respondents at the Supreme Court.  Chief John Alaga lost his case at the Trial Court and Appeal Court. The Appellant at the Supreme Court was Stephen Odey and he lost the case to the Respondents. On that note, the subsisting verdict of the Trial and Appeal Courts are affirmed and yet to be upturned. It cannot be upturned because the Judgement of the Supreme Court is final and infallible. This is the “Truth” that is incontrovertible.

It is not the duty of the Senate to look at Court Judgements or interpret Court Judgements. The Clerk of the Senate is supposed to verify the Certificate of Return issued by INEC and document the Elected Senator, in line with the Certificate of Return (Latest in time) for swearing in. The Senate President’s duty is to act in line with the advice of the Clerk of the National Assembly, based on the Legal brief and advice of the Legal Department.

It is worthy of note that, with the evidence before us, the Legal Department and the Clerk of the National Assembly have advised the Senate President to Swear in Rt. Hon. Jarigbe Agom Jarigbe, in obedience to Court Judgements, INEC Compliance and Issuance of Certificate of Return to Jarigbe and in total compliance with the Rule of Law.

The question is – is the Senate President competent to Interpret Judgements of Courts, or question the actions of INEC? Can the Senate President possibly ask for Results of an Election, before swearing in an Elected Senator, after a Certificate of Return has been issued to an elected Senator? So why should the Senate President Dwell on Court Judgements and the Interpretation thereof, when there is a valid and authentic Certificate of Return Issued?

What is going on in the Senate, in the case of Stephen Odey and Rt. Hon. Jarigbe Agom Jarigbe, is an illegality taken too far. The Senate President is wrong and should retrace his steps to avoid bringing the Institution of the Legislature to disrepute.

The General Public should advise Barr Daniel Bwala, who has been hallucinating on this issue, to accept defeat, instead of prevaricating and coming up with half-truths. These are issues that would have been canvassed in Court. At this point, it is too late to cry wolf. It is Professional misconduct to attempt impugning and criticizing a Judgement of the Supreme Court, whose Judgement is final and infallible.

The Case of Hon. (Mrs) Dorathy Mato V. Hon Iorwase Herman Hembe (2017) is a locus classicus on who the authentic candidate of a Party is. Hembe was declared winner  by INEC but the Supreme Court gave the Victory to Dorathy Mato, who took over the Seat of House of Reps in 2015.  Both Hon. Herman Hembe and Hon. Dorathy Mato were members of the APC and the Suite was a Pre-Election Matter.

It is the Party that contested elections and not the candidate. Rt Hon Jarigbe Agom was declared winner of the PDP Primary election, monitored by INEC in line with section 85, 86 and 87 of the electoral act.

Rt. Hon Jarigbe Agom Campaigned and took part in all stages of the election but Stephen Odey was erroneously declared. Many thanks to the Judiciary, the last hope of our Democracy. Rt Hon Jarigbe’s Victory  has been affirmed by the Judgment of the Supreme Court.

The citations of Barr Daniel Bwala are academic and inconsequential at this point. These citations can be applied in Future Litigations, if admissible. The Supreme Court is final and infallible.

Omang Omang, a practising lawyer, writes from Cross River.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here